Tips for the website (1455 Views)
written by
Arphetic
on 09.12.06 16:13
I stated this in the IRC, but assuming noone is allive there i'll post it here.
I did this kind of site test checking the load time and stuff and it gives really good tips:
http://r.netmechanic.com/toolbox/summary.cgi?f=f/116/342/0856/36-25983/&s=NetMechanic&fv=5&ft=3
It helped me improve my site (www.rootx.nl), and since there is a slow loading time, it would be cool if you would improve it. Wouldnt bet too hard since its mostly the flags not having width and height tags.
GL HF
I did this kind of site test checking the load time and stuff and it gives really good tips:
http://r.netmechanic.com/toolbox/summary.cgi?f=f/116/342/0856/36-25983/&s=NetMechanic&fv=5&ft=3
It helped me improve my site (www.rootx.nl), and since there is a slow loading time, it would be cool if you would improve it. Wouldnt bet too hard since its mostly the flags not having width and height tags.
GL HF
Comments
skooli
Saturday, 9th December 2006 16:19
buy internet, this page was loaded completely in 0.5s for me
spam crossfire or commit suicide if youre bored
spam crossfire or commit suicide if youre bored
yes lets blow up html size by adding height and width to every flag
thats gonna make things faster, especially if flags come from disk/ramcache anyways .........
thats gonna make things faster, especially if flags come from disk/ramcache anyways .........
It might blow the size, but it will definately imrpove the loading time.
For the rest I dont care what you do with it. Just a simple attempt to give a nice hint :)
For the rest I dont care what you do with it. Just a simple attempt to give a nice hint :)
I only loaded this page in 0.6 s...
try r_picmip 3 Arphetic
try r_picmip 3 Arphetic
what's the problem with the way it is now? 8|
too many spelling erros imo:
162 possible errors
GAMESTV, Username, ETL, Kaos, Mailserver, sFx, Blogs, mQ...
162 possible errors
GAMESTV, Username, ETL, Kaos, Mailserver, sFx, Blogs, mQ...
bad spelling mistakes
The only thing that bugs me about this site, is that whatever you click it has to reload the entire site. But that happens fast, so im cool:)
only way to get around that is frames or javascript, both suck cocks
since when does java script suck cock.... where is the basis for that comment :S
ajax!
[e] not good for that kind of use btw
[e] not good for that kind of use btw
0.891 seconds with fasterfox
https://addons.mozilla.org/firefox/1269/
https://addons.mozilla.org/firefox/1269/
Mind if I post that on RootX?
10 Minuten with Holzmodem (TM)
11.750s with my bro downing.
0.375 :>!
come on, lets do a race :S
come on,baby!!!
http://www.gamestv.org/images/smilies/smile.gif
http://www.gamestv.org/images/smilies/smile.gif
62ms (4ms)
68ms (4ms)
